Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 13:36

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How is digital marketing important for business?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Tariff news isn't good... - Daily Kos
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Horoscope for Sunday, June 22, 2025 - Chicago Sun-Times
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
First look at Battlefield 6 campaign leaks from latest test - Video Games Chronicle
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How can we become the best humans? How can we trust each other?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
China Housing Demand to Stay at 75% Below Peak, Goldman Says - Bloomberg